Alberta decide once again rebukes woman who promises Magna Carta invalidated Canadian regulation

© Delivered by Nationwide Put up
Jacquie Phoenix.

In an uncommon ruling a few months in the past, an Alberta judge created it very clear Jacquie Robinson was on slender ice.

If she continued to threaten the courts with her bizarre, “pseudo law” claims about the Magna Carta and treasonous judges and governments, the lawful procedure would not sit idly by, promised Justice Robert Graesser of the Courtroom of Queen’s Bench.

As a 1st step, he banned the female from continuing to characterize a mom embroiled in a bitter child-custody dispute.

It looks Robinson – who likes to go by the pseudonym Jacquie Phoeni x – was unmoved.

She responded by sending additional hostile letters to courtroom team, likening them to war criminals and suggesting that they could be tried and confront lifestyle in jail.

In the meantime, some of her movement’s 1000’s of followers have been peppering other law enforcement and authorities organizations in Canada and the U.K. with comparable oddball promises and threats.

Now Graesser has issued a next ruling , 1 which is especially topical as conspiracy theories like QAnon and false statements about the pandemic, vaccines and U.S. election fraud spread widely.

The judge warned generally about the perils of different “fakery” becoming broadcast about the Internet, wherever “there are no filters to distinguish in between actuality and fiction.”

Then he imposed clean sanctions on Robinson, barring her from symbolizing everyone in the province’s lawful system or sending correspondence to the courts boasting authority dependent on her unusual Magna Carta theory.

The decide also advised she may possibly have damaged felony legal guidelines versus scary justice officials, and threatened to cite her for contempt of court docket if she did not heed his cautions.

“This may possibly seem to be the use of a sledgehammer to crush an ant,” wrote Graesser. “I would as an alternative use the analogy of an inoculation to prevent a virus.”

“These schemes are absolutely nothing more than downsides, led by persons who count and feed on the oft-quoted assertion attributed to P.T. Barnum (of circus fame): a sucker is born each moment,” the decide extra. “(But) the Courts are not suckers. And the Courts will not be intimidated.”

Alberta’s legal process, even though, is not by yourself in remaining targeted.

The Magna Carta group’s Fb webpage, which promises 34,000 users, involves letters from various British and Canadian government entities responding to members’ worries. One U.K. municipality states a follower’s assertions did not permit the person to avoid paying out residence tax. A further voices disappointment that “you proceed to compose in an intemperate way, particularly threatening to arrest me.”

Ottawa attorney Richard Warman , who has extended fought extremism online, claimed it is time law enforcement investigated what he named Robinson’s “psychotic attacks” on the courts.

The risk is that somebody acts on Robinson’s rhetoric in a violent way, he said, as transpired with a diverse brand of “sovereign law” proponent who murdered an Ottawa tax choose and two other individuals in 2007.

“You’re threatening a decide with the gallows, and now you’re threatening court clerks, arguing they’re equivalent to Nazi war criminals. And which is not Ok,” Warman said. “The law enforcement require to action in to defend the integrity of the judicial technique.”

Robinson, who’s in the U.K. meeting with other followers of the motion, was unrepentant when arrived at Friday, calling the courts a “criminal company.”

“My notices are not threatening,” she informed the Countrywide Publish by means of textual content. “They state the Legislation and the penalty for breaking that Regulation.”

On her group’s Facebook page Robinson warns that her “grand fannaly” (sic) is coming shortly. “Greasser are you completely ready for your arrest?” she wrote about the choose. “We absolutely sure are.”

Robinson is a proponent of “Practical Lawful Dissent,” a convoluted idea the courtroom ruling describes simply just as “nonsense.”

It revolves all over the Magna Carta — the 13th-Century accord among England’s King John and noblemen — and precisely its article 61. That provision claimed a committee of barons could strip John of assets if he violated the agreement.

The section was taken out a year later on, in 1216, and Canada adopted its personal, independent structure almost 40 a long time ago. Even in the U.K., the Magna Carta is a mostly historic doc nowadays, a excellent image of democracy whose specific content material has been mainly replaced over the hundreds of years.

But 28 British lords invoked defunct post 61 in a unsuccessful, 2001 endeavor to avoid the ratification of a European Union treaty. As a consequence, the movement claims, all governments and laws all over the Commonwealth are now invalid.

The principle may sound far too absurd to be taken very seriously, but the Alberta lady has by now performed tangible harm, the decide notes.

The mom Robinson represented had required greater entry to her daughter. Now she’s charged with abducting the woman to the U.S., and is preferred for failing to appear in court.

“After becoming a member of with Ms. Robinson and her group, (the mom) no lengthier has any obtain to her daughter,” the judge famous.

The motion has gained tiny traction in other places, possibly. Just one of the letters posted on its Facebook website page is from the federal Justice Department , responding to a member’s missives demanding that the Canadian armed forces be created obtainable to “protect the realm” versus a treasonous routine.

The creator politely rejects the request, noting that the Magna Carta is of no force or result in Canada and the letters “reflect no lawful approach identified to Canadian jurisprudence.”