Coffee shop. Photo: Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock.comAn Amarillo attorney faces a legal malpractice lawsuit by a prison defendant who claimed the attorney satisfied him in a espresso store because he didn’t have an office environment.
In a circumstance touches on how important that privacy can be for a shopper when speaking about confidential legal professional-customer privileged details with his lawyer, customer Daniel Esteban Flores submitted the litigation against Travis Lee Tidmore, a solo practitioner who represented Flores in a sexual assault circumstance.
“Defendant did not have an business office. Plaintiff and his father achieved defendant at a espresso store to explore the scenario,” alleged the petition in Flores v. Tidmore, filed Thursday in Potter County’s 47th District Courtroom. “Plaintiff and his father felt incredibly awkward talking about a case of this nature (i.e. sexual assault) in a general public location.”
Two subsequent conferences took put in a coffee shop or restaurant, alleged the petition. They talked about the facts of the case, and the defenses that Flores might have readily available.
“It neglects to point out the espresso store we satisfied at had a convention space, with a glass door. It is enclosed,” explained Tidmore. “It was not out in the open up, wherever everyone can listen to what is likely on.”
Tidmore earned his regulation degree from Pepperdine College College of Law in 2008, explained his Condition Bar of Texas profile. He was certified in Texas in 2008, and he has no general public disciplinary heritage. His bar profile lists his apply areas as business enterprise, criminal, family members, intellectual home, wills-trusts-probate and leisure law.
Flores also claimed that Tidmore was not well prepared for the representation.
“Defendant did not investigate the details of the case. He just listened to the young plaintiff, and wrote down the information on his laptop or computer when sitting in the coffee shop,” the petition claimed.
On the day of the trial in the situation, Tidmore allegedly explained to Flores that he was confident the decide would grant probation. But Tidmore experienced not made an arrangement with the prosecutor about punishment for Flores, claimed the petition. Flores and his family members ended up “perplexed” because Tidmore did not file an software asking for probation at the listening to, and didn’t file it until finally afterwards in the situation, reported the petition.
The customer experienced damages of at the very least $100,000 because of the lawyer’s negligent functions and omissions, the petition mentioned.
But Tidmore claimed that he denies the allegations and that he did practically nothing completely wrong in the representation. He pledged to battle the litigation.
“I did everything by the e book,” he reported. “I feel the legal professional they employed to do the appeals—this is his final-ditch work to do a thing for his client. … This is suddently coming, mainly because the writ was denied.”
Alex Tandy, a solo practitioner in North Richland Hills who signifies Flores, didn’t immediately react to a call trying to get remark.
More Stories
Unions launch legal challenge against law allowing agency workers to replace strikers | Business News
the Necessary Legal Dance Step to Outmaneuver Trial Lawyers
Texas law banning abortion takes effect Aug. 25 after Supreme Court judgment